I am not a "conspiracy theorist" just a realist. I would like to see "teased out" the hospital deaths - whether by comorbidity or the "deaths by protocol" aka DBP laid out by Dr. Bryan Ardis. The DBP are caused by protocols put in place to artificially inflate death rate by causing lethal injury with modern medical treatment. I wonder how a survival rate of 99.x% without medicine should have a much lower threshold than what has transpired IN hospital. "So many patients are dying".... So what are the numbers on Patients admitted vs discharged vs. expired. If the treatment "worked" in hospital the survival rate should be 99.9999x% if you revived medical treatment not less than untreated. $0.02
I'm obviously coming to this article late in the day, but have you tried to look at the UK data? They provide ACM by vaccination status although I don't know how easy it is to get age range breakdowns.
I would highlight two other factors that may explain the rise in Covid-19 deaths that mirrors the vaxx rates.
First, the jabs are known to suppress the immune system for about two weeks making a vaxxed person more susceptible to all infections, including SARS-CoV2.
Second, a recent study from Stanford reported that vaccine spike antigen and mRNA persist for at least sixty days in the tissues. IMO, it is possible that deaths attributed to the virus (with a positive PCR or antigen test) may, in fact, be from the vaxx.
Below I have listed 42 examples of what are listed in the CDC Provisional Mortailty database as "Covid deaths." Not one of these has anything to do with a viral event being the actual cause of death.
Now these are not exceptions. I could literally do this all through the evening and scarcely begin to get through the listing of these 900,000+ deaths. There were for example over 14,000 accidental deaths as of Nov. 2020 that were listed as "Covid deaths." Not the largest category of fraud just illustrative.
The entire database looks like this- this is a random selection:
30 years -X70 (Intentional self-harm by hanging, strangulation and suffocation).
75 years-F54 (Psychological and behavioural factors associated with disorders or diseases classified elsewhere).
75 years-F10.1 (Mental and behavioural disorders due to use of alcohol, harmful use).
34 years -F19.1 (Mental and behavioural disorders due to multiple drug use and use of other psychoactive substances, harmful use).- there are 3 of these in the 34 year old age group.
33 years -X44 (Accidental poisoning by and exposure to other and unspecified drugs, medicaments and biological substances)- there are 9 of these in the 33 year old age group.
33 years -X42 (Accidental poisoning by and exposure to narcotics and psychodysleptics [hallucinogens], not elsewhere classified)- there are 5 of these in the 33 year old age group.
33 years O96.1 (Death from indirect obstetric cause occurring more than 42 days but less than one year after delivery)- there are 10 of these in the 33 year old age group.
31 years X44 (Accidental poisoning by and exposure to other and unspecified drugs, medicaments and biological substances)- there are 12 of these in the 31 year old age group.
This is a great point and one of the avenues I am pursuing. Ideally, I would like to manually adjust the stack COVID/Non-COVID chart by age to adjust for deaths that were obviously not COVID. That will give us a clearer picture. The next step is to tease the deaths from the vaccines. This will be a bit trickier.
Math isn't my long suit so it's just a guess that UK stats would be helpful in finding some baseline percentages.. The detail infections, hospitalization and death by age and vax status none, 1-2-3 jabs. Table 10 p 41 is where the charts that seem relevant begin. Big time kudos and thanks for your heart and brainpower all in for the fight!
Thank you Milo! I believe in the 3rd quarter of 2021, the CDC started to NOT count people as "vaccinated" until two weeks AFTER they received their shots (under the guise that it takes the shot 2 weeks to be effective). Even if someone had an adverse effect within 5 min of being injected, or died from it quickly, they were still counted as "Unvaccinated".... and IMO, what happened to many of those people could have been falsely labeled as having died from Covid.
Go in, take DEATHVAX, drop dead and be counted as Unvaccinated....
Boy, the cult peons are going to have blood flowing in the street when they do Some basic homework... a couple months after they help murder their child
With clear evidence from places like Israel, where the vast majority of "COVID" hosp. & deaths are among the vaxxed, it must be either a contributing factor, or even the vector itself. Couple that with suppression of prophylaxis, and murderous "hospital protocols" skewing the numbers, we're left with Poirot's paradox from "Murder on the Orient Express": Which of the 12 suspects caused the victim's death, if they had all stabbed him? Answer: Does it matter which? They all helped.
Great analysis! I never cease to be amazed by the number of blue pillers (BPer) who still believe that covid vaccines protect them now given the predominance of Omicron. Have not spoken to one BPer that is aware that the vaccine was designed to produce the spike protein (S1) as an attempt to prevent native variant covid infection but that did not. As a result the jabbed have less than zero protection from Omicron for the simple reason that the OC spike is a completely different virus unrecognized by their immune systems (or worse) which is why the world is seeing so many multi-jabbed getting covid repeadedly (as in Bryan Adams).
I have yet to talk to one BPer who is aware of the fact that the more jabs you get, the greater your chance of getting Omicron BECAUSE their innate immune systems have been compromised and no longer have the ability to stop the virus nor stop them from spreading it. As one analyst commented, the jab "protection" against a "bicycle" variant is overwhelmed by a "motocycle" viral attack; the jabs instead appear to allow this new variant to bypass the immune system altogether (ADE?) One only need look at data from highly jabbed nations such as Iceland (vs Sweden) or Israel to see this happening (as well as rising hospitalizations and death in the jabbed.)
Jessica Rose has produced a great pictoral description of how the innate immune system has been compromised by jabs.
"These COVID-19 mRNA injectable products are causing, yes, causing, immune system dysregulation - and not just in the context of the adaptive system, but in the context of the innate system. Not only that, but these findings provide very good reasons as to why we are seeing resurgences of latent viral infections and other adverse events reported in VAERS (and other adverse event reporting systems) and perhaps more importantly, why we should under no circumstances inject this crap into our children."
Is it any surprise that A. Bourla (pFizer CEO) recently warned that the vaccinated will need boosters at least every six months (UK Health Minister says every 3 months)! I wonder how many saw that coming in early 2021 as these jabs were rolled out and heavily promoted?
It seems intuitive that two issues may be important to getting the clearest picture. First, of course, clean and code the data appropriately for analysis. Deaths “with” vs “from” covid, deaths after vax before official “vaccinated” status was assigned, etc.
Second, some adverse effects obviously happen fast, others are seen after a delay. Clearly this variance might obscure the population-level trends and temporal correlations. A proper time-series analysis accounting for actual individual shot timing and possibly AE type seems necessary.
Excellent data. I was interested in this data for another reason. I'm investigating the possibility the novel coronavirus (and Covid 19) had begun to spread throughout the country weeks and months before the lockdowns of mid-March 2020. Your data on all deaths ages 25 to 44 allows me to compare deaths for Weeks 1 to 13 between 2019 and 2020. These are the weeks before Covid was supposed to be in America (or only in "isolated" locations). The CDC said there was no evidence of COVID in America until "latter January 2020." If my hypothesis is correct, at least some people were already dying well before the first "official" deaths in late February or early March. Few of these deaths would have been among those 25 to 44, but some of them would have been. Readers can tell me if these increases in deaths YoY are statistically significant ...
Was Covid killing people before March 2020?
All Cause deaths ages 25 to 44 - 2020 compared to 2019 absolute numbers/increases ….
Note: Official Covid lockdowns began around week 10.
Week 1: + 8.4 percent increase in deaths in 2020 compared to same week in 2019.
Week 2: + 8 percent
Week 3: + 11.34 percent
Week 4: + 9.82 percent
Week 5: + 10 percent
Week 6: + 6.09 percent
Week 7: + 8.32 percent
Week 8 : 12.91 percent
Week 9 + 6.56 percent
Week 10 + 8.02 percent
Week 11 (Lockdowns begin): + 7 percent
Week 12: + 14.58 percent
Week 13 (end of March): + 13.05 parent
Note: This Alabama man did NOT die the first week of January 2020 from COVID ... but he came as close to death as you can come without dying. He was 39 at the time. I doubt he was the only American who almost died or could have been a death certificate. I wrote this article:
Here's an article where I show my frustration at all of this evidence of early spread being completely ignored - by public health officials and the press. This story doesn't even mention the Red Cross archived blood story, which came out after I wrote this. Of supreme importance, no public health official has ever interviewed any of these almost certain early cases. How could this be?
I don't know why all this evidence is being ignored (or maybe I do know why). I've come to believe that at least some public health officials had to have known this virus was spreading - and spreading widely - throughout the world months before January 2020. So this makes me think there has been a concerted cover-up of this information/knowledge. It's undeniable that public health officials made no effort to investigate these likely/possible early cases. It's not what they did investigate, it's what (and who) they did not investigate that tells the tale IMO.
Thank you very much for posting this. I have zero doubt this virus was spreading and spreading widely in communities, countries and states around the world well before the Wuhan outbreak and many months before the lockdowns of March 2020. I don't know why this blockbuster story was basically ignored. COVID antibodies found in 106 American Red Cross blood samples collected between December 2019 and January 2020. And the study was only from a few weeks in just nine states. The study found that 1.43 percent of the people in this random sample possessed antibodies for COVID. Extrapolated to the entire U.S. adult population, this would mean that approximately 3.6 million Americans may have been infected with this virus by mid-January 2020, with some number of these Americans almost certainly infected by November 2019. Two percent of those who donated blood in mid-December in three states (California, Washington and Oregon) tested positive for COVID antibodies.
WA state was official ground zero for covid. WA state detected one patient that late December 2019 was hospitalized and had blood drawn that retroactively tested was positive. Also WA University showed by gene mutation analysis covid was having community spread (as opposed to direct infections from Wuhan) in that ground zero county both in January and February.
I'm skeptical of people reported they had covid in other parts of the country, but in WA and CA both January and February must have seen some covid deaths. One thing to realize is that the East coast got infected through Europe with a mutated version ('variant' before we called it variants), which was distinct from the original Wuhan strain. That is why we can prove little community spread occurred in most of the US before the Europe wave via the East coast.
This Seattle Times story identified two people in Washington state who had symptoms in December and later tested positive for antibodies. One was “Jean,” a retired nurse.
This study of archived Red Cross Blood found 36 (I think) positive samples from Wash, Calif and Oregon. The blood was donated around Dec. 13, 2020. Since antibodies were already present, this means the people were probably infected in November 2019.
Summary - Six States: California, Wash, Oregon, NJ, Florida and Alabama. This is not “isolated” spread. Six more states produced positive antibody results from Red Cross blood taken in January = 12 states with confirmed cases judging by antibody results - all infected before the first official case in USA.
Absolutely, but to clarify my point was not that there were infections. There were. Europe also seen infections far earlier. With 400000 people from Wuhan landing in the US in these months prior, that was inevitable. But I don't see evidence there was massive inter-community spread yet until the European wave hit us. That variant was also more infectious than the two original Wuhan variants, and explains why these two original variants were gone almost instantly similar like Omiron wiped out Delta. That may explain why it did not get its explosive exponential growth like later.
I see lots of evidence of inter-community spread. I see it in the "flu reports" and the flu outbreaks all over America. I see it when you see infected people in states thousands of miles away from each other - NJ, Florida, Alabama, Washington, California, etc. Read the stories of the people who did get sick and later test positive for antibodies. Many report a lot of other other people getting sick with the same symptoms at the same time. Tim and Brandie McCain's roommate was bad sick at the same time they were, so was Brandie's boss. Michael Melham got sick at a conference in Atlantic City. He said numbers people at the same conference also became ill. Look at the 11 positive cases in Delray Beach Florida - couples and children got sick (and later tested positive for antibodies). This is all evidence of a contagious virus "spreading" - in families, in conferences - not in one "isolated" city - but in cities and states all over America. I've identified about 75 people who might have had it pre-February in my home town and nearby communities. I had the symptoms and so did my two children. So did my daughter's teacher and her children. All of us tested negative for flu ... and my hometown is not unique - it's 2 1/2 hours from Sylacauga, where Brandie and Tim got so sick. Brandie says it seems like "everyone in town" was sick the same time they were.
I pulled data from an obit site. Filtered to Portland randomly but could have picked anywhere. Could be bad data but the data went back years. Just throwing it out there. Showed huge spike end of 2018 beginning of 2019. Actually declining over time. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jJZNAVO1MaV1RPsv2DSdqK5IC8otSJJw/view?usp=drivesdk
I saw that. Thanks for posting. I think obits and funeral homes could be a great source of data - especially for deaths among those over 70 between Dec. 2019 and February 2020. Some of this data supports my hypothesis and some doesn't. But some of it doesn't seem to make any sense so I also wonder if it's "bad data" or not complete.
Is it possible to tease out the unvaxed deaths that correspond with vaccination within the first two weeks after being vaxxed? CDC guidelines classify any deaths in the first two weeks of vaccination as unvaccinated, so if someone has an immediate adverse response to the vaccine it's not classified as a vaccine-related death. Kind of like house rules at the casino, when a tie goes to the house's favor. Is this dataset capable of producing those actual results?
From a layman: I don't see enough of this caveat: Government statistics cannot be vetted/ or fully vetted.
This makes me question anti covid experts, who I generally trust.
I mean, these experts constantly attack methods, duplicity (and rightly so)... of Government covid collection numbers, but then paste links without a word.
Major red flag for me. I don't distrust you all.... just your lack of judgment in this one area.
Do you trust these stats or not? Me... I use them but knowing they are probably way off much of the time.
I was curious about the deaths that are caused the Covid-19 shots, so used a backdoor approach to approximate the number. I established a base using CDC US Deaths From All Causes using their weekly data from 1-1-2014 through the end of 2019. I identified 16 statistically significant oscillations in that data, the most predominant of which is the annual oscillation, and then, along with the trend projected those into the pandemic time frame. I then compared that synthesis to the actual CDC data, most recently through 1-29-2022. There were 1,022,904 deaths in excess the normal expected. From the beginning of 2020 to 12-14-2020 excess deaths were 369,862 for a weekly average of 7,705. From 12-14-2020 to 1-29-2022 excess deaths were 653,042 for a weekly average of 11,069. December 14, 2020 was when vaccines became available, so the increase in weekly deaths after that was 3,363.7 or a total of 198,421 for the 59 weeks after 12-14-2020.
A graphic representation plus some more of the details are shown here:
Just to clarify, for the purposes here, all COVID deaths are considered excess since they did not exist in the base period. . We see a higher proportion in female.
So, wouldn't that be an indication that the COVID-related excess death data is fishy? It is well-known that males are significantly more likely to die from it.
I meant a higher proportion compared to non-covid. That makes sense because, as I am about to post later today 2020 excess deaths for age 25-44 is driven by drug overdose, alcoholism, shootings and car wrecks - all of which impact males more.
I am not a "conspiracy theorist" just a realist. I would like to see "teased out" the hospital deaths - whether by comorbidity or the "deaths by protocol" aka DBP laid out by Dr. Bryan Ardis. The DBP are caused by protocols put in place to artificially inflate death rate by causing lethal injury with modern medical treatment. I wonder how a survival rate of 99.x% without medicine should have a much lower threshold than what has transpired IN hospital. "So many patients are dying".... So what are the numbers on Patients admitted vs discharged vs. expired. If the treatment "worked" in hospital the survival rate should be 99.9999x% if you revived medical treatment not less than untreated. $0.02
Conspiracies happen ALL the time. Insurance, law, medical, financial etc etc have to develop theories to determine these.
Thank you! Deaths by "injection" status would probably be very eye-opening.
I agree. I was also going to see if I could pull out suicides and overdoses to better isolate Non-COVID deaths across time.
I'm obviously coming to this article late in the day, but have you tried to look at the UK data? They provide ACM by vaccination status although I don't know how easy it is to get age range breakdowns.
I would highlight two other factors that may explain the rise in Covid-19 deaths that mirrors the vaxx rates.
First, the jabs are known to suppress the immune system for about two weeks making a vaxxed person more susceptible to all infections, including SARS-CoV2.
Second, a recent study from Stanford reported that vaccine spike antigen and mRNA persist for at least sixty days in the tissues. IMO, it is possible that deaths attributed to the virus (with a positive PCR or antigen test) may, in fact, be from the vaxx.
https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(22)00076-9#relatedArticles
Counting Covid Deaths
https://healthfreedomdefense.org/counting-covid-deaths/
Below I have listed 42 examples of what are listed in the CDC Provisional Mortailty database as "Covid deaths." Not one of these has anything to do with a viral event being the actual cause of death.
Now these are not exceptions. I could literally do this all through the evening and scarcely begin to get through the listing of these 900,000+ deaths. There were for example over 14,000 accidental deaths as of Nov. 2020 that were listed as "Covid deaths." Not the largest category of fraud just illustrative.
The entire database looks like this- this is a random selection:
30 years -X70 (Intentional self-harm by hanging, strangulation and suffocation).
75 years-F54 (Psychological and behavioural factors associated with disorders or diseases classified elsewhere).
75 years-F10.1 (Mental and behavioural disorders due to use of alcohol, harmful use).
34 years -F19.1 (Mental and behavioural disorders due to multiple drug use and use of other psychoactive substances, harmful use).- there are 3 of these in the 34 year old age group.
33 years -X44 (Accidental poisoning by and exposure to other and unspecified drugs, medicaments and biological substances)- there are 9 of these in the 33 year old age group.
33 years -X42 (Accidental poisoning by and exposure to narcotics and psychodysleptics [hallucinogens], not elsewhere classified)- there are 5 of these in the 33 year old age group.
33 years O96.1 (Death from indirect obstetric cause occurring more than 42 days but less than one year after delivery)- there are 10 of these in the 33 year old age group.
31 years X44 (Accidental poisoning by and exposure to other and unspecified drugs, medicaments and biological substances)- there are 12 of these in the 31 year old age group.
This is a great point and one of the avenues I am pursuing. Ideally, I would like to manually adjust the stack COVID/Non-COVID chart by age to adjust for deaths that were obviously not COVID. That will give us a clearer picture. The next step is to tease the deaths from the vaccines. This will be a bit trickier.
Math isn't my long suit so it's just a guess that UK stats would be helpful in finding some baseline percentages.. The detail infections, hospitalization and death by age and vax status none, 1-2-3 jabs. Table 10 p 41 is where the charts that seem relevant begin. Big time kudos and thanks for your heart and brainpower all in for the fight!
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1058464/Vaccine-surveillance-report-week-9.pdf
You can go here and look through the "Covid-19 Provisional Mortality Statistics (U07.1)" database:
https://wonder.cdc.gov/controller/datarequest/D176;jsessionid=FFDFFE5A4AA44A43AED0A7DD3C9A
No doubt you already know how to use it but if not I can walk you through it.
Thank you Milo! I believe in the 3rd quarter of 2021, the CDC started to NOT count people as "vaccinated" until two weeks AFTER they received their shots (under the guise that it takes the shot 2 weeks to be effective). Even if someone had an adverse effect within 5 min of being injected, or died from it quickly, they were still counted as "Unvaccinated".... and IMO, what happened to many of those people could have been falsely labeled as having died from Covid.
NET effect: -1 Vax caused, +1 Covid caused.
Accentuating the lie by factor of two.
Satan as statistician
The CDC always counted people this way.
That may cdc announced it will stop recording “breakthrough” cases
Go in, take DEATHVAX, drop dead and be counted as Unvaccinated....
Boy, the cult peons are going to have blood flowing in the street when they do Some basic homework... a couple months after they help murder their child
With clear evidence from places like Israel, where the vast majority of "COVID" hosp. & deaths are among the vaxxed, it must be either a contributing factor, or even the vector itself. Couple that with suppression of prophylaxis, and murderous "hospital protocols" skewing the numbers, we're left with Poirot's paradox from "Murder on the Orient Express": Which of the 12 suspects caused the victim's death, if they had all stabbed him? Answer: Does it matter which? They all helped.
Great analysis! I never cease to be amazed by the number of blue pillers (BPer) who still believe that covid vaccines protect them now given the predominance of Omicron. Have not spoken to one BPer that is aware that the vaccine was designed to produce the spike protein (S1) as an attempt to prevent native variant covid infection but that did not. As a result the jabbed have less than zero protection from Omicron for the simple reason that the OC spike is a completely different virus unrecognized by their immune systems (or worse) which is why the world is seeing so many multi-jabbed getting covid repeadedly (as in Bryan Adams).
I have yet to talk to one BPer who is aware of the fact that the more jabs you get, the greater your chance of getting Omicron BECAUSE their innate immune systems have been compromised and no longer have the ability to stop the virus nor stop them from spreading it. As one analyst commented, the jab "protection" against a "bicycle" variant is overwhelmed by a "motocycle" viral attack; the jabs instead appear to allow this new variant to bypass the immune system altogether (ADE?) One only need look at data from highly jabbed nations such as Iceland (vs Sweden) or Israel to see this happening (as well as rising hospitalizations and death in the jabbed.)
Jessica Rose has produced a great pictoral description of how the innate immune system has been compromised by jabs.
"These COVID-19 mRNA injectable products are causing, yes, causing, immune system dysregulation - and not just in the context of the adaptive system, but in the context of the innate system. Not only that, but these findings provide very good reasons as to why we are seeing resurgences of latent viral infections and other adverse events reported in VAERS (and other adverse event reporting systems) and perhaps more importantly, why we should under no circumstances inject this crap into our children."
https://jessicar.substack.com/p/the-bnt162b2-mrna-vaccine-against
Is it any surprise that A. Bourla (pFizer CEO) recently warned that the vaccinated will need boosters at least every six months (UK Health Minister says every 3 months)! I wonder how many saw that coming in early 2021 as these jabs were rolled out and heavily promoted?
It seems intuitive that two issues may be important to getting the clearest picture. First, of course, clean and code the data appropriately for analysis. Deaths “with” vs “from” covid, deaths after vax before official “vaccinated” status was assigned, etc.
Second, some adverse effects obviously happen fast, others are seen after a delay. Clearly this variance might obscure the population-level trends and temporal correlations. A proper time-series analysis accounting for actual individual shot timing and possibly AE type seems necessary.
Excellent data. I was interested in this data for another reason. I'm investigating the possibility the novel coronavirus (and Covid 19) had begun to spread throughout the country weeks and months before the lockdowns of mid-March 2020. Your data on all deaths ages 25 to 44 allows me to compare deaths for Weeks 1 to 13 between 2019 and 2020. These are the weeks before Covid was supposed to be in America (or only in "isolated" locations). The CDC said there was no evidence of COVID in America until "latter January 2020." If my hypothesis is correct, at least some people were already dying well before the first "official" deaths in late February or early March. Few of these deaths would have been among those 25 to 44, but some of them would have been. Readers can tell me if these increases in deaths YoY are statistically significant ...
Was Covid killing people before March 2020?
All Cause deaths ages 25 to 44 - 2020 compared to 2019 absolute numbers/increases ….
Note: Official Covid lockdowns began around week 10.
Week 1: + 8.4 percent increase in deaths in 2020 compared to same week in 2019.
Week 2: + 8 percent
Week 3: + 11.34 percent
Week 4: + 9.82 percent
Week 5: + 10 percent
Week 6: + 6.09 percent
Week 7: + 8.32 percent
Week 8 : 12.91 percent
Week 9 + 6.56 percent
Week 10 + 8.02 percent
Week 11 (Lockdowns begin): + 7 percent
Week 12: + 14.58 percent
Week 13 (end of March): + 13.05 parent
Note: This Alabama man did NOT die the first week of January 2020 from COVID ... but he came as close to death as you can come without dying. He was 39 at the time. I doubt he was the only American who almost died or could have been a death certificate. I wrote this article:
https://uncoverdc.com/2020/06/25/an-alabama-man-nearly-died-from-covid-19-the-first-week-in-january/
Here's some evidence in support of your theory: https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/we-have-wasted-2-years-on-lockdowns-stanford-medical-professor-blasts-govts-after-covid-antibodies-found-in-blood-sample-from-september-2019/
Here's an article where I show my frustration at all of this evidence of early spread being completely ignored - by public health officials and the press. This story doesn't even mention the Red Cross archived blood story, which came out after I wrote this. Of supreme importance, no public health official has ever interviewed any of these almost certain early cases. How could this be?
https://uncoverdc.com/2020/07/13/covid-19-is-a-real-search-for-the-truth-now-taboo/
I don't know why all this evidence is being ignored (or maybe I do know why). I've come to believe that at least some public health officials had to have known this virus was spreading - and spreading widely - throughout the world months before January 2020. So this makes me think there has been a concerted cover-up of this information/knowledge. It's undeniable that public health officials made no effort to investigate these likely/possible early cases. It's not what they did investigate, it's what (and who) they did not investigate that tells the tale IMO.
Concerted cover up is waaay beyond doubt
Thank you very much for posting this. I have zero doubt this virus was spreading and spreading widely in communities, countries and states around the world well before the Wuhan outbreak and many months before the lockdowns of March 2020. I don't know why this blockbuster story was basically ignored. COVID antibodies found in 106 American Red Cross blood samples collected between December 2019 and January 2020. And the study was only from a few weeks in just nine states. The study found that 1.43 percent of the people in this random sample possessed antibodies for COVID. Extrapolated to the entire U.S. adult population, this would mean that approximately 3.6 million Americans may have been infected with this virus by mid-January 2020, with some number of these Americans almost certainly infected by November 2019. Two percent of those who donated blood in mid-December in three states (California, Washington and Oregon) tested positive for COVID antibodies.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/covid-19-likely-in-u-s-in-mid-december-2019-cdc-scientists-report-11606782449
WA state was official ground zero for covid. WA state detected one patient that late December 2019 was hospitalized and had blood drawn that retroactively tested was positive. Also WA University showed by gene mutation analysis covid was having community spread (as opposed to direct infections from Wuhan) in that ground zero county both in January and February.
I'm skeptical of people reported they had covid in other parts of the country, but in WA and CA both January and February must have seen some covid deaths. One thing to realize is that the East coast got infected through Europe with a mutated version ('variant' before we called it variants), which was distinct from the original Wuhan strain. That is why we can prove little community spread occurred in most of the US before the Europe wave via the East coast.
So the truth is a bit of both.
This Seattle Times story identified two people in Washington state who had symptoms in December and later tested positive for antibodies. One was “Jean,” a retired nurse.
https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/antibody-test-results-of-2-snohomish-county-residents-throw-into-question-timeline-of-coronaviruss-u-s-arrival/
This study of archived Red Cross Blood found 36 (I think) positive samples from Wash, Calif and Oregon. The blood was donated around Dec. 13, 2020. Since antibodies were already present, this means the people were probably infected in November 2019.
https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciaa1785/6012472
Here’s the earliest case I know of - in New Jersey from November. It’s the mayor of Belleville, NJ:
https://www.foxnews.com/world/china-new-jersey-mayor-coronavirus-november
At least 11 positive cases in south Florida - earliest in November. Almost all from one neighborhood:
https://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/20200516/coronavirus-florida-antibody-tests-bolster-suggestion-covid-spread-early-in-florida
Two cases (a married couple) in Alabama in December (I wrote this story):
https://uncoverdc.com/2020/06/25/an-alabama-man-nearly-died-from-covid-19-the-first-week-in-january/
Summary - Six States: California, Wash, Oregon, NJ, Florida and Alabama. This is not “isolated” spread. Six more states produced positive antibody results from Red Cross blood taken in January = 12 states with confirmed cases judging by antibody results - all infected before the first official case in USA.
Absolutely, but to clarify my point was not that there were infections. There were. Europe also seen infections far earlier. With 400000 people from Wuhan landing in the US in these months prior, that was inevitable. But I don't see evidence there was massive inter-community spread yet until the European wave hit us. That variant was also more infectious than the two original Wuhan variants, and explains why these two original variants were gone almost instantly similar like Omiron wiped out Delta. That may explain why it did not get its explosive exponential growth like later.
I see lots of evidence of inter-community spread. I see it in the "flu reports" and the flu outbreaks all over America. I see it when you see infected people in states thousands of miles away from each other - NJ, Florida, Alabama, Washington, California, etc. Read the stories of the people who did get sick and later test positive for antibodies. Many report a lot of other other people getting sick with the same symptoms at the same time. Tim and Brandie McCain's roommate was bad sick at the same time they were, so was Brandie's boss. Michael Melham got sick at a conference in Atlantic City. He said numbers people at the same conference also became ill. Look at the 11 positive cases in Delray Beach Florida - couples and children got sick (and later tested positive for antibodies). This is all evidence of a contagious virus "spreading" - in families, in conferences - not in one "isolated" city - but in cities and states all over America. I've identified about 75 people who might have had it pre-February in my home town and nearby communities. I had the symptoms and so did my two children. So did my daughter's teacher and her children. All of us tested negative for flu ... and my hometown is not unique - it's 2 1/2 hours from Sylacauga, where Brandie and Tim got so sick. Brandie says it seems like "everyone in town" was sick the same time they were.
I pulled data from an obit site. Filtered to Portland randomly but could have picked anywhere. Could be bad data but the data went back years. Just throwing it out there. Showed huge spike end of 2018 beginning of 2019. Actually declining over time. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jJZNAVO1MaV1RPsv2DSdqK5IC8otSJJw/view?usp=drivesdk
I saw that. Thanks for posting. I think obits and funeral homes could be a great source of data - especially for deaths among those over 70 between Dec. 2019 and February 2020. Some of this data supports my hypothesis and some doesn't. But some of it doesn't seem to make any sense so I also wonder if it's "bad data" or not complete.
Many thanks Milo Mac!
Wow, thanks for this information! Subscribed. Looking forward to following your continued digging.
Is it possible to tease out the unvaxed deaths that correspond with vaccination within the first two weeks after being vaxxed? CDC guidelines classify any deaths in the first two weeks of vaccination as unvaccinated, so if someone has an immediate adverse response to the vaccine it's not classified as a vaccine-related death. Kind of like house rules at the casino, when a tie goes to the house's favor. Is this dataset capable of producing those actual results?
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/bulletins/deathsinvolvingcovid19byvaccinationstatusengland/deathsoccurringbetween1january2021and31january2022
From a layman: I don't see enough of this caveat: Government statistics cannot be vetted/ or fully vetted.
This makes me question anti covid experts, who I generally trust.
I mean, these experts constantly attack methods, duplicity (and rightly so)... of Government covid collection numbers, but then paste links without a word.
Major red flag for me. I don't distrust you all.... just your lack of judgment in this one area.
Do you trust these stats or not? Me... I use them but knowing they are probably way off much of the time.
Except death in first 2 was is most probably from vax.
I think I read , if it's very close it should be counted as a death ,( before covid). Chd maybe?
At least investigated that way would be reasonable
I was curious about the deaths that are caused the Covid-19 shots, so used a backdoor approach to approximate the number. I established a base using CDC US Deaths From All Causes using their weekly data from 1-1-2014 through the end of 2019. I identified 16 statistically significant oscillations in that data, the most predominant of which is the annual oscillation, and then, along with the trend projected those into the pandemic time frame. I then compared that synthesis to the actual CDC data, most recently through 1-29-2022. There were 1,022,904 deaths in excess the normal expected. From the beginning of 2020 to 12-14-2020 excess deaths were 369,862 for a weekly average of 7,705. From 12-14-2020 to 1-29-2022 excess deaths were 653,042 for a weekly average of 11,069. December 14, 2020 was when vaccines became available, so the increase in weekly deaths after that was 3,363.7 or a total of 198,421 for the 59 weeks after 12-14-2020.
A graphic representation plus some more of the details are shown here:
https://i.imgur.com/amtWWUl.jpg
It might be useful to see how much timing overlap/ correllation to deaths reported in vaers exists. That will also inform the causal link.
Congress should divert FDA budget to you and about 250 experts.
What types of HHS OIG audits are out there? I bet they were tamed also
Do the expected gender differences appear in the excess deaths attributed to the virus?
There are gender differences. Males have a higher incidence of Non-COVID excess deaths. Something I am looking into
What about in so-called "COVID excess deaths"?
Just to clarify, for the purposes here, all COVID deaths are considered excess since they did not exist in the base period. . We see a higher proportion in female.
So, wouldn't that be an indication that the COVID-related excess death data is fishy? It is well-known that males are significantly more likely to die from it.
I meant a higher proportion compared to non-covid. That makes sense because, as I am about to post later today 2020 excess deaths for age 25-44 is driven by drug overdose, alcoholism, shootings and car wrecks - all of which impact males more.